Through the Looking Glass
Let me see if I have this straight. Newsweek runs a story, from an anonymous source, to the effect that a guard at Gitmo flushed, or tried to, a Koran down the toilet. This lead to widespread rioting in the Muslim world. The administration blamed the rioting on the unsubstantianted story in Newsweek, and the magazine said the source would "neither confirm or deny" the story. (Shades of the Glomar Explorer!) Newsweek retracted the story, and calls have come from some quarters for a ban on all use of anonymous sources.
But major stories such as the whole list of Watergate crimes, and relatively minor (albeit juicy) stories like Bill Clinton's dalliances, would not come to the public's attention without the interplay of the goverment spokespersons, witnesses, actors, and - yes - anonymous sources. Of course, anonymous sources usually are a threat more to the powerful than to the weak - otherwise, they wouldn't have to be anonymous. So under cover of indignant outrage, the White House gets to intimidate the press, and the press hastens to censor itself.
Here the story takes a kooky turn. The Defense Department's "Hood Inquiry", which was set up as a result of the Newsweek article, has released it's findings (after business hours on Friday) regarding abuse of the Koran at Gitmo. Five incidents were repored and confirmed (among a general finding that respect for the Koran has been consistently good). A detainee alleged that a Koran was thrown into a bag of wet towels, and another guard said that the Koran belonged in the toilet. In the wierdest incident, a prisoner and his Koran were splashed with urine from a guard who left his post to relieve himself next to an airvent, and the wind blew his urine into the air vent, and the prisoner was splashed. Can anyone believe this malarkey?
The report then continues to detail where the real abuse occurred - at the hands of the detainees themselves! The detainees, the report said, used the Koran as a pillow, ripped pages out of it, tried to flush it down the toilet (!), and urinated on it. The detainees!
Does anyone else get that feeling of slipping through the looking glass again?
But major stories such as the whole list of Watergate crimes, and relatively minor (albeit juicy) stories like Bill Clinton's dalliances, would not come to the public's attention without the interplay of the goverment spokespersons, witnesses, actors, and - yes - anonymous sources. Of course, anonymous sources usually are a threat more to the powerful than to the weak - otherwise, they wouldn't have to be anonymous. So under cover of indignant outrage, the White House gets to intimidate the press, and the press hastens to censor itself.
Here the story takes a kooky turn. The Defense Department's "Hood Inquiry", which was set up as a result of the Newsweek article, has released it's findings (after business hours on Friday) regarding abuse of the Koran at Gitmo. Five incidents were repored and confirmed (among a general finding that respect for the Koran has been consistently good). A detainee alleged that a Koran was thrown into a bag of wet towels, and another guard said that the Koran belonged in the toilet. In the wierdest incident, a prisoner and his Koran were splashed with urine from a guard who left his post to relieve himself next to an airvent, and the wind blew his urine into the air vent, and the prisoner was splashed. Can anyone believe this malarkey?
The report then continues to detail where the real abuse occurred - at the hands of the detainees themselves! The detainees, the report said, used the Koran as a pillow, ripped pages out of it, tried to flush it down the toilet (!), and urinated on it. The detainees!
Does anyone else get that feeling of slipping through the looking glass again?
1 Comments:
Cool blog! If you want to increase your readership and interact with other atheists, check out Atheism Online at http://atheismonline.com/tiki-page.php?pageName=Welcome
Post a Comment
<< Home